Can you explain this in more detail with an example?
Sure! Let’s take a steak as an example. From a technical point of view, a steak is a complex structure, a matrix made up of different components. So we divided the components into muscle, fat and blood. These are plant-based alternatives. They consist of commercially available ingredients such as soy and pea protein, chickpeas, beetroot, nutritional yeast and coconut fat. But if we just mix them together, we end up with a useless paste. We have to arrange the components in a certain way, for example blood and fat surrounded by muscle in a specific ratio.
Both steps together allow us to create a 3-dimensional model in which each component is placed in a specific location. This way, we can build a database with various combinations and experiment with them to achieve the desired properties. How does sirloin differ from rib-eye in terms of component placement? How do texture, taste, cooking behaviour or colour change when we re-arrange the components?
We use 3D printing to develop a product with specific mechanical properties that nobody but the cow knows how to make.
What are the challenges of 3D food printing?
The first challenge is the complexity of the printing. Until recently, there were only 3D printers that could process either multiple components or a high viscosity. But we combine both. We really had to explore new ground here.
The second aspect is food safety, because people eat the 3D-printed product. That means that we need regulatory approval for all markets we enter.
The third aspect is cost and efficiency. As previously mentioned, 3D printing was originally designed for the production of prototypes. Cost and time are less relevant in this context. But with food, we want to end up eating the model – and a lot of it. So we have to be fast and produce on a large scale.